Enterprise Security & Access Review Hub
A larger organisation running dozens of applications, each with its own user list, granted access as people joined and never systematically reviewed. Nobody can say who owns a given application, who last reviewed its access list, or what happened to an exception flagged six months ago.
The reality
A larger organisation runs dozens of applications, each with its own user list, with access granted as people joined and never systematically reviewed. Nobody can say who owns a given application, who last reviewed its access list, or what happened to an exception flagged six months ago.
Where it breaks
- An application with no assigned owner sits invisible until an audit asks who's responsible for it.
- An access review, where it happens at all, is a bulk approval with no individual decision behind it.
- An exception to policy gets flagged once and then forgotten, with no expiry forcing it back into view.
- A remediation instruction gets sent and nobody confirms whether it was ever actually carried out.
The Afivox approach
Afivox doesn't propose a tool that promises to secure everything automatically. It starts from what access governance actually requires, a named owner, an individual decision, a tracked remediation, and builds the system that makes accountability visible instead of assumed.
The system
Users
Application owners, security/compliance team, system administrators
Application
Application inventory, ownership, review campaigns
Services
Exceptions, remediation, evidence collection
Data
Application → Owner, ReviewCampaign → ReviewDecision, AccessGrant → Exception
Integrations
Reads access lists from the applications under review; writes remediation instructions out to their administrators
Security
Per-user review decisions, expiring exceptions, confirmed remediation
How it flows
- Application inventoried
- Owner assigned
- Review campaign opened
- Decision recorded per user
- Exception or remediation
- Evidence retained
Secure by design
- Every application has exactly one accountable owner at any time; an unowned application is flagged, never silently skipped.
- A review decision is recorded per user per campaign. Never a bulk approval with no individual record.
- An exception has an expiry date; one with no expiry is surfaced as a policy violation, not a quiet default.
- A remediation task isn't closed until the actual administrator confirms the access was changed.
Designed to improve
- Accountability: every application has a named, accountable owner.
- Review integrity: a campaign produces individual decisions, not a rubber stamp.
- Exception control: an exception has an expiry and a reason, never an open-ended gap.
- Audit readiness: evidence for any review or remediation is exportable on demand.
Before
- Nobody can say who owns a specific application until someone goes looking.
- An access review is a bulk approval nobody actually read.
- An exception gets flagged once and never revisited.
- A remediation instruction is sent, and whether it happened is unknown.
After
- Every application has a named owner, visible on the inventory.
- A review produces a recorded decision for every user, every time.
- An exception carries an expiry that forces it back into view.
- A remediation task stays open until the administrator confirms it's done.
This is what we'd build. Yours will look a little different.
Every concept on this page changes once we sit with how your operation actually runs. Tell us what's different about yours.
Start the operations review